Home | Alerts | News | Programs | Contact Us | Become an Activist
Your Best Chance to Protect Wyoming's Only National Grassland
Comments Needed On Proposed Thunder Basin Plan by January 22nd

Protection & Restoration
Prairie Dogs and Ferrets
Where the Buffalo Roam?
Prairie Wilderness
The Fine Print
Livestock Grazing
Oil and Gas Leasing
Roadless Areas
Research Natural Areas

What You Can Do

Back to Preliminary Alert

America's prairie grasslands have been altered more than almost any other ecosystem on the North American continent. As settlement expanded westward, prairies were plowed up for agriculture, grazed over by livestock, and more recently, roaded, drilled and mined for oil and gas and coal. Fortunately, pockets of wild prairie still remain. The largest and most significant of these are on our National Grasslands, managed by the U.S. Forest Service (USFS). Wyoming's only National Grassland--the Thunder Basin--is one of the most intact areas in the entire northern Great Plains. For example, at least six roadless areas on the Thunder Basin still retain their wild character and remain eligible for Wilderness designation. Many troubled wildlife species still live on the Thunder Basin, including Ferruginous Hawks, Swift Fox, Burrowing Owl, and Black-tailed Prairie Dogs (a keystone species in the prairie ecosystem). Right now, citizens have a rare opportunity to speak out in support of a wild grassland and to secure protection for prairie wildlife. The Forest Service released the management Plan for the Thunder Basin which will determine the destiny of the grassland for at least the next decade. It is absolutely essential that people who care about the future of the Thunder Basin make their voices heard by writing to the Forest Service by January 22nd.


Time for Protection & Restoration

The USFS's proposed management Plan for the Thunder Basin makes some improvements over the past decades of management which focused excessively on production of coal, oil, gas, and domestic livestock. But it still falls short in many critical areas, as discussed below.


Black-Tailed Prairie Dogs and Black-Footed Ferrets

Black-tailed prairie dogs are a very important but vanishing member of the prairie ecosystem. Over 170 wildlife species have been found in Prairie Dog towns. But black-tailed prairie dogs now occupy less than one percent of their historic range nationwide, and in Wyoming have been reduced significantly. As a result, several species, which depend on or benefit from prairie dogs, have similarly declined to a point that their survival is jeopardy. Recently, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service designated the black-tailed prairie dog as warranted for listing under the Endangered Species Act.

Probably the best known endangered prairie critter is the Black-footed ferret. Once thought to be extinct, Black-footed ferrets live only in prairie dog towns and now exist in only a handful of locations in the wild. The Thunder Basin's Cheyenne River area is one of the highest priorities in the entire country for reintroduction of Black-footed ferrets, but the Forest Service proposes to manage less than half of the available habitat for ferret restoration. This will not go far enough to help recover one of the most endangered mammals in North America.

Mountain plovers, burrowing owls, ferruginous hawks, and swift fox are also dependent on prairie dog towns for survival. Because many of the remaining prairie dog colonies occur on private land where poisoning and shooting will likely continue, the public lands of the National Grasslands will play a crucial role in the survival of the prairie dog ecosystem and recovery of the Black-footed ferret and other wildlife. For this reason, prairie dogs and associated wildlife need the strongest possible protection in the Thunder Basin management plan. Unfortunately, the Forest Service preferred Plan takes only half-measures. While it allows for the possibility of restrictions on prairie dog shooting, it does not give specific direction for these restrictions. It is possible that poisoning may be used to reduce colonization of adjacent lands, even though the private landowner is free to use any means necessary for control on their own property. In other words, the proposed Plan will conceivably still allow shooting everywhere on the grassland and poisoning everywhere except for on the few thousand acres set aside for black-footed ferret reintroduction.


Where the Buffalo Roam?

Although great herds of bison once roamed the high plains of Wyoming, currently, wild bison are limited to a small region of the country encompassing Yellowstone and Grand Teton National Parks. The National Grasslands represent one of the best places to restore wild bison. However, as written, the Plan will not restore wild bison to the Thunder Basin, despite the fact that the majority of public comments support bison restoration. Bison are ecologically adapted for life on the prairie and are completely natural in this environment. Restoring bison simply makes sense from an ecological standpoint. In fact, it is difficult to envision a healthy prairie ecosystem without bison. Restoring bison also would enhance the recreation experience for grassland visitors and be an incredible draw for tourists.


Prairie Wilderness

Right now not a single acre of the 550,000 acre Thunder Basin is designated Wilderness. There is no permanently protected example of the native prairie in Wyoming. However, citizens previously identified six prairie grassland areas which still meet the Wilderness criteria. All six are still primarily wild and are larger than 5,000 acres (see table below). In the proposed Plan, however, the Forest Service did not recommend a single area for wilderness designation! Because of the high development pressure on the Thunder Basin (coalbed methane, oil & gas, and coal mine development), it is likely that if the six remaining wild areas are not protected now, in the management plan process, there will never be a chance for wilderness on the Thunder Basin.

Recently, using computer mapping and analysis, Biodiversity Associates identified three more potential Wilderness areas on the Thunder Basin: Prairie Creek, Cheyenne River, and Six-Mile Basin. We have yet to conduct field work to verify the condition of these areas, but the Forest Service should give these areas protection until field work is completed.


The Fine Print

Among the most important parts of any management plan are the environmental protection rules that apply to all or some part of the grassland. The rules are called standards and guidelines. Standards are "must do" requirements while guidelines are "should do" statements that don't actually require the Forest Service to protect anything at all. For example, a standard to protect prairie dogs from poisoning would prohibit poisoning and be enforceable. However, a guideline that prohibits prairie dog poisoning doesn't have any force; it is just a suggestion. On the ground, guidelines mean nothing. In the proposed Plan, many of the measures needed to protect and recover wildlife and other natural values are only guidelines. To make the Plan meaningful and enforceable, many of the guidelines must to be changed into standards.


Livestock Grazing

In the Proposed Plan, 93% of the Thunder Basin is deemed suitable for livestock grazing. In addition, it does not provide the strong direction needed to protect special areas from damage due to livestock grazing. One-third of the TBNG should be rested from livestock grazing annually. This will allow adequate amounts of taller grasses necessary for several wildlife species. Livestock should also be kept away from streams and wetlands.


Oil and Gas Leasing

Oil and gas development should be prohibited in areas where it is incompatible with other uses. For example, the Forest Service should not allow oil and gas development in proposed wilderness areas, and should deny placement of fixed structures for all remaining roadless areas, special interest areas, research natural areas and other important wildlife and recreation areas.


What You Can Do

The Forest Service is taking public comment on the proposed Grassland Plan and Final Environmental Impact Statement. Of the alternatives studied by the Forest Service, the agency wants to adopt Alternative 3. While Alternative 3 makes some positive steps, it fails to adequately protect the natural legacy of the Grasslands. Alternative 4 is much better, it recommends some wilderness designation, protects prairie dogs from poisoning and recreational shooting, and protects special biological values by designating more acres for Research Natural Areas. However, both Alternatives 3 and 4 leave out bison restoration and Wild & Scenic River designation for the Cheyenne River. Overall, citizens need to support the good points of Alternative 4 and push for needed improvements. Regardless of the Alternative, we recommend the following:

  • All six confirmed roadless areas should be recommended for Wilderness designation, and the three potential roadless areas should be protected and field checked for Wilderness potential (see list below).
  • Prairie Dogs, Black-footed Ferrets, and all native wildlife should be given stronger protection. The entire 120,000+ acre Cheyenne River Ferret site should be designated for Ferret restoration, rather than the proposed 47,890 acres. Protecting the entire area would allow about 70 more endangered ferret families to survive, and help achieve national ferret recovery goals. prairie dog shooting and poisoning should be completely prohibited in occupied prairie dog towns. Anything that limits or slows down recovery of prairie dogs should be halted until 20% of grassland suitable habitat is occupied.
  • Research Natural Areas should be designated to protect natural values and special ecological communities, wherever they occur on the Thunder Basin. The Forest Service only plans to designate two - which just isn't enough. See below for list and description of areas which should be designated.
  • Wild Bison should be restored to the Grasslands. The Cheyenne River Ferret reintroduction site and other areas should be evaluated for use as Bison reserves. The Forest Service should also consider replacing cattle on some allotments with Bison.
  • Livestock grazing should be better controlled to protect streamside areas and wildlife habitat. In problem areas, range riders or grazing prohibitions should be emphasized, not construction of additional fences.
  • Some areas should be off-limits to oil, gas, and coal bed methane development. All Roadless Areas, Special Interest Areas, Research Natural Areas, and other important wildlife and recreation areas should be protected.
  • Streams and Rivers need better protection. The Cheyenne River needs to be re-evaluated for designation under the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act.
  • Wishy-washy environmental protection "guidelines" should be changed into measurable and nondiscretionary "standards" so they are enforceable and actually result in resource protection.
  • Strengthening standards to conserve at risk wildlife and plants. Lethal predator control must be prohibited, protection must be provided for native fisheries dependant on turbid waters, all construction and pesticide use within 2 miles of important sites for breeding and nesting birds and swift fox must be prohibited, and a complete list of at risk species must be developed and protections devised.

Write your comments on the Forest Service's management Plan now! Feel free to use any or all of the information on this website to write your letter, but remember, personalized letters carry the most weight with decision makers.

Please send your written comments to be received by January 22nd, 2002 to:

Northern Great Plains Planning Team
USDA Forest Service
125 North Main Street
Chadron NE 69337
email:
cloop@fs.fed.us
Phone: (308)432-0300


Roadless Area Names and Acreage

Area Name Acres (min., most are actually larger)
HA Divide 5,060
Red Hills 6,840
Downs 7,150
Miller Hills 10,410
Duck Creek 12,330
Cow Creek Buttes 14,500
Six-mile Basin (potential) 5,776
Prairie Creek (potential) tbd
Cheyenne River (potential) tbd


Research Natural Areas Which Should Be Designated

Area Name Acres Ecological Community/Features
Antelope Creek 1,090 Two pieces; high quality plains stream ecosystem
Big Draw 2,480 Western wheatgrass/green needlegrass, blue grama/western wheatgrass and big sagebrush/western wheatgrass, boxelder/chokecherry associations
Cedar Knoll 1,592 Western wheatgrass/green needlegrass, ponderosa pine/sun sedge, and prairie cordgrass associations
Cheyenne River 1,009 Plains river ecosystem, Plains cottonwood/western wheatgrass/leafy bulrush community, sandbar willow/mesic graminoid community type, mountain plover and black_tailed prairie dog communities
Coal Bank Draw 2,327 Prairie sandreed/needle and thread association, birdsfoot sagebrush type, ponderosa woodland
Cow Creek Buttes Scoria buttes, sandstones, sand and shale badlands, shrubland-woodland mosaic
Downs 3,502 Birdsfoot sage community, shrub steppe, scoria buttes, sandstones, woodland
Meadow Creek 4,273 mixed grass grassland associations: little bluestem/blue grama, little bluestem/threadleaf sedge, western wheatgrass/green needlegrass, blue grama/western wheatgrass, big sagebrush/western wheatgrass/black greasewood, little bluestem/prairie sandreed grass, and ponderosa woodland
Miller Hills Scoria buttes, sandstones, sand and shale badlands, shrubland-woodland mosaic
Playas 342 Western wheatgrass/needle spikerush association, playa lakebeds
Rochelle Hills 3,570 Ponderosa pine and Rocky Mountain juniper woodland grassland mosaic on sandstone, scoria substrates; escarpment plant associations: bluebunch wheatgrass/Sandberg bluegrass associations, four wing saltbush and silver sagebrush associations
Rock Creek 590 Big sagebrush/needle and thread and Silver sagebrush/western wheatgrass plant associations
Wildlife Draw 631 Big sagebrush/needle and thread and needle and thread/blue grama plant associations





Home | Alerts | News | Programs | Contact Us | Become an Activist
Links | Public Officials | Publications | Bibliography

Biodiversity Associates, P.O. Box 1512, Laramie, WY 82073
(307) 742-7978 - maggie@voiceforthewild.org