Home | Alerts | News | Programs | Contact Us | Become an Activist
Sensitive Wyoming Landscapes Threatened by Energy Development

Draft Maps and Map Descriptions
Prepared by Biodiversity Conservation Alliance
June 5, 2001


Biodiversity Conservation Alliance has prepared a series of 6 maps, 5 of which show in various ways the sensitive lands in Wyoming which are threatened by the Bush administration’s energy policy (and particularly those portions of the policy dealing with the public lands).  The sixth map shows the general location of coal, natural gas, and oil in Wyoming.  We have not yet prepared a map showing the land ownership, but we can provide that if you need one.

Note  from Jeff K:   One aspect of energy development in Wyoming that is NOT depicted on the maps but which is extremely important to me is the continuing loss of wildness and open space.  When most people think of Wyoming, what comes to mind are big open spaces with little human impacts or industrial development.  These are difficult to show on a map, and they are not strictly environmental quality issues like clean air and water or the health of wildlife populations.  Nonetheless, it is this openness and wildness that defines Wyoming to many.  The on-going explosive expansion of energy development in the state has the potential (and high likelihood) to eliminate or greatly reduce these very qualities.  It could change Wyoming forever by the addition of thousands of miles of new roads, thousands of well pads, pipelines, powerlines, compressor stations and tanks, and high levels of motor vehicle traffic. There may not be many people or many cities in Wyoming during or after the boom, but there definitely would be a great deal of industrial “development” and corresponding loss of wildness and open vistas.

Map 1.  Sensitive Wyoming Landscapes Threatened by Energy Development:
wynrgm01c.jpg

This map shows 3 large colored polygons: the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem, the Powder River Basin, and the Red Desert (with the Jack Morrow Hills study area from the BLM highlighted within).  These are the areas considered by the Wyoming conservation community to have the combined highest biological/wildlands values AND the most threats from the Bush energy policy.  The boundaries approximate and should be used for general information only.  Not all of the lands inside the polygons are pristine.  Inside each of the 3 areas there are portions that have been subjected to high levels of mineral development, road building, mining, etc.  However, each area still possesses outstanding wild lands and wildlife/fish resources, has significant portions in an undeveloped or unindustrialized state, and is a conservation target for concerned citizens in Wyoming.

It is important to note that public lands in other areas of the state are also threatened by the Bush energy policy but are not shown on the map. For example, the Adobetown potential Wilderness southwest of Rawlins and southeast of Rock Springs is a large complex of incredible hoodoos, beautiful badlands, and great vistas.  It is threatened by gas development and is being impacted right now.  Although Adobetown is over 80,000 acres in size, it is not a large “landscape” compared to the three shown on the map.  Thus while protecting places like Adobetown is very important to us, it is not a large continuous region and therefore is not shown on this general map. However, the key central portion of the Adobetown area is shown on the other maps described below.


Maps 2 and 3.  Sensitive Landscapes in Wyoming (Color Maps)
wynrgm02.jpg and wynrgm03.jpg

These two maps are identical except that Map 2 includes the National Parks and designated Forest Service Wilderness Areas, while Map 3 omits these areas.  Both maps show most of the large landscapes in Wyoming that possess high biological value, wildlife and rare plant, roadless and undisturbed lands (potential Wilderness), and the like.  Please note, however, that these maps do NOT show the important big game habitat.  Instead, big game information is shown on Map 4.  We inadvertently omitted the names of the National Forests and the Thunder Basin National Grassland.  Forests shown are the Bridger-Teton, Shoshone, Bighorn, Medicine Bow, and Black Hills. We can provide a locator map for these if you desire. Here is a brief description of each type of item on Maps 2 and 3:

· Citizens Proposed BLM Wilderness – These are the boundaries of the 1994 Wyoming citizens’ proposal for Wilderness on BLM lands.  The total acreage is about 1.1 million acres.  The citizens’ proposal was much more accurate, complete, and inclusive than the BLM inventory (see Wilderness Study Area description below).  However, even the citizens missed some important and outstanding wilderness-quality lands during the field work for the 1994 proposal.  Currently Biodiversity Associates is re-inventorying the BLM lands in Wyoming for potential Wilderness, and we are finding significant new acreage.  We expect to add about 50,000 to 100,000 acres to the existing citizens proposal through our field inventory during the next two field years.  Those portions of these units which are NOT Wilderness Study Areas have no substantive protection from industrial development.

· Roadless Areas (USFS) – These are the U.S. Forest Service inventoried roadless areas from the Clinton administration’s roadless area conservation environmental impact statement.  As with the BLM inventory, citizens have knowledge of wilderness-quality land omitted or left out by the Forest Service.  However, we do not have a statewide map of these areas of disagreement.  Only for the Medicine Bow National Forest in southern/eastern Wyoming and the Thunder Basin National Grassland are citizens’ areas shown.  For all other forests, the official USFS boundaries are shown. Note that these are administrative designations, not legislative, and hence are subject to the prerogatives of the current administration.  Thus these areas are probably not safe from industrial development.

· Conservation Sites (TNC) – These are “conservation sites” from completed and draft ecoregional plans prepared by The Nature Conservancy.  Note that these sites are NOT solely public lands.  Conservation sites are defined in this way by TNC:   “In each ecoregional plan, the goal has been to conserve the viable native species and natural communities (called “conservation targets”) by identifying certain areas on the ground (“a portfolio of sites”) which, if protected, would provide the greatest protection for all the plant and animal species of the entire ecoregion.” Data were taken from these Ecoregional Plan titles: “Wyoming Basins,” “Ecoregional Conservation in the Northern Great Plains Steppe,” “Utah-Wyoming Rocky Mountains,” and “Central Shortgrass Prairie.”  Please note that the “Utah-Wyoming Rocky Mountains” plan and boundaries are DRAFT versions and are subject to change before the final document is released.  Each of the TNC sites has a narrative description that is available in the ecoregional plans.  We can provide these to you.  Most of these sites have little or no protection from industrial development.

· Wilderness Study Areas (USFS) – These few Forest Service areas were designated by the U.S. Congress for additional study and analysis during forest planning, including study of each area’s suitability and unsuitability for designation as Wilderness. These studies will take place during revision of the respective Forest Plans.

· Wilderness Study Areas (BLM) – These are areas administratively designated by BLM for consideration as possible Wilderness.  They were designated during the BLM wilderness inventory and study process of the 1980’s and early 1990’s.  BLM has made specific recommendations for designation of all, part, or none of each WSA.  In many cases, BLM has failed to recommend all or significant parts of areas possessing outstanding wilderness qualities.  And BLM failed to designate several key areas as WSAs.  We show the boundaries of the WSA but do not show the recommended vs non-recommended portions of each WSA.  There are existing mineral leases in some WSAs.

· Research Natural Areas (USFS) - These are administratively designated US Forest Service lands “in which natural conditions are maintained insofar as possible… by allowing natural and physical processes to prevail without human intervention….”   They are designated “to provide a spectrum of relative undisturbed areas representing a wide range of natural variability within important natural ecosystems and environments… and areas with special or unique characteristics or scientific importance.”  We use Forest Service boundaries but we also include some areas being studied for possible RNA designation on the Medicine Bow NF and Thunder Basin National Grassland.

· ACEC (BLM) – These are BLM public lands administratively designated “for special management attention to protect and prevent irreparable damage to important historic, cultural, or scenic values, fish and wildlife resources, or other natural systems or processes….”

· National Wildlife Refuge -  These are “lands and waters for the conservation, management, and where appropriate, restoration of the fish, wildlife, and plant resources and their habitats…” managed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife.  Rules, regulations, and level of protection vary.

· Wilderness – (Map 2 only) Congressionally designated Wilderness areas.  Direct impacts from energy development would likely be few, but indirect impacts (air quality and visibility, impacts to wildlife by industrial development outside the Wilderness border if the given populations inhabit both Wilderness and non-Wilderness lands, limits to future expansion of some imperiled species, etc.) could be significant.

· National Parks – (Map 2 only).

Caveats - These sensitive area maps are not complete representations of the outstanding and extensive wild lands and wildlife habitat in Wyoming.  Instead, given the lack of time to gather information, we show only the larger and more extensive areas with wildlife, rare plant, and wilderness values.  Important areas or values not shown on the map are: additions to citizens’ proposed BLM wilderness resulting from our inventories in 2000 and 2001; citizens’ proposed Wilderness on Forests where citizens’ have expanded USFS units or added new units; many rare plant sites; wetlands and outstanding national resource waters; imperiled fish populations; raptor nests; sage grouse leks and other habitat; prairie dog colonies and potential black-footed ferret habitat; non-wilderness scenic areas; historic and cultural sites outside of the Jack Morrow Hills; and much more.


Map 4.  Important Big Game Habitat in Wyoming (Color Map)
wynrgm04.jpg

This map shows crucial range (and severe winter relief range) and birthing grounds for elk, mule deer, and pronghorn antelope.  Crucial habitat is “the determining factor in a population’s ability to maintain itself at a certain level.”  Habitat not considered “crucial” or severe winter relief is not shown on the map. Thus spring/summer/fall, winter/yearling, and noncrucial winter habitat are not shown.  These data were obtained from Wyoming Game and Fish Department.  Also shown are big game migration routes, but ONLY for the northwestern portion of the state from Yellowstone Lake to Kemmerer.  Data were not available for migration routes in the remainder of the state. The shown migration routes were provided by Wyoming Wildlife Federation.  To develop the migration route information, the Federation used 9 different technical reports and books from Wyoming Game and Fish Department, universities, and other sources.  We can provide a list of these sources if requested.


Map 5.  Sensitive Landscapes in Wyoming (Gray Areas + Blue Water Only)
wynrgm05.jpg

This map is an attempt to combine areas from Maps 3 and 4, and to display all the sensitive/important areas in a single gray shade.  Thus all the sensitive areas from Map 3, and all the important big game crucial and winter range from Map 4, are shown in grey.  Migration routes for Big Game is not shown.


Map 6.  Energy Development Threats to Sensitive Landscapes in Wyoming
wynrgm06.jpg

This map shows oil and gas basins, coal basins, a catch-all oil and gas potential category called “oil and gas habitat,” and existing or permitted oil and gas wells.  The well data include shut in, abandoned, existing, and non-yet-drilled but permitted wells, to the best of our knowledge.  We currently are refining this map and hope to have a more useful version in a week or so.  Basins and “habitat” data are adapted from the Wyoming Oil and Gas Resource Assessment Mapper at the University of Wyoming (www.wims.uwyo.edu).   Source data for the UW mapper are from government reports named on the map. Well data is from WY Oil and Gas Conservation Commission.
--
Jeff Kessler
Biodiversity Conservation Alliance
PO Box 6032
Laramie, WY  82073
(307) 742-7978

Home | Alerts | News | Programs | Contact Us | Become an Activist
Links | Public Officials | Publications | Bibliography

Biodiversity Conservation Alliance, P.O. Box 1512, Laramie, WY 82073
(307) 742-7978 - maggie@voiceforthewild.org