NEWS RELEASE

For Immediate Release
March 19, 2008

Report Details Rollbacks for Idaho Backcountry

Contact Information

Boise, ID - The Center for Biological Diversity, Biodiversity Conservation Alliance, and more than 50 other local and national conservation organizations recently released a report detailing the Bush administration’s plan to open the door to development in Idaho’s roadless backcountry forests — forests currently protected under the Roadless Area Conservation Rule. 

Idaho's 9.3 million acres of roadless backcountry make up the core of the last intact forest ecosystem in the lower 48 states — the last place where all of the native plants, fish and wildlife — from the smallest plant to the largest predator — can still be found.

Duane Short of Biodiversity Conservation Alliance explained, “Roads carve up wildlife habitat in more ways than one. First, roads divide our forests and open spaces and then, development and activities along these roads, at best, introduce frequent disturbance to wildlife and, at worst, invite continual long-term wildlife disturbance and degradation of the surrounding habitat.”

“We can either leave our last pristine forests as they are, or open the door to mining, logging and other corporate special interests,” said Paul Spitler of the Center for Biological Diversity, “The Bush administration has chosen the latter.”

The report, titled “Wild At Heart,” highlights key differences between the two plans:  current management under the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule (RACR), and the Bush administration’s proposed Idaho rule—part of the administrations new plan to undo roadless area protections on a state-by-state basis. 

The RACR resulted from the most extensive and popular federal rulemaking process in history and establishes reasonable and nationally-consistent management policies for managing national forest roadless areas.

Compared to current management under the RACR, changes under the Bush administration’s proposed Idaho rule include:

• Eight times more annual logging
• A four-fold increase in annual road construction and reconstruction;
• An increase of 545 million tons of phosphate mining; and
• Opening an additional 609,500 acres to other mining, geothermal and oil and gas exploration and development.

The U.S. Forest Service’s Draft Environmental Impact Statement predicts the Bush administrations proposed Idaho rule would:

• Diminish natural processes, roadless characteristics, and scenic integrity across 6 million acres (an area the size of Massachusetts);
• Adversely impact hunting and fishing opportunities;
• Negatively affect numerous species and habitats, including 611 sensitive plant populations;
• Increase the spread of noxious weeds across 609,500 acres;
• Compromise the wilderness character of currently pristine forests.

“The ecological, economic and social impacts of changing current management policies would be profound,” said Spitler, “which is why the Roadless Area Conservation Rule should remain intact.”

Because Idaho is the first state petition analyzed under the administration’s new flawed rule, it could set precedent for managing roadless areas in other states.  The administration has already proposed similar rollbacks in Alaska and Colorado. Wyoming’s Roadless Areas may be next to hit the administration’s chopping block!

“Every remaining piece of roadless backcountry in our national forest system deserves protection under the Roadless Area Conservation Rule,” said Spitler.

The Forest Service will be soliciting comments on the new Idaho rule through April 7th, 2008. All U.S. citizens’ comments are solicited.

Duane Short, Biodiversity Conservation Alliance, (307) 742-7978
Paul Spitler, Center for Biological Diversity, (541) 306-4772