|
Yesterday's announcement by President Clinton that he is instructing the
U.S. Forest Service to protect remaining roadless areas on Forest Service
Lands was panned by Wyoming's Governor and congressional delegation.
However, recent public opinion polls in southern Wyoming show that
citizens do support the presidents action. The Governor and delegation
appear to be out of step with Wyoming residents, even in counties directly
adjacent to National Forest lands.
Local Wyoming Polls Show Support for Roadless Area Protection
In the past few years, two polls were conducted in southern Wyoming
regarding land use issues on county federal land and on the Medicine Bow
National Forest (MBNF). The results show that people want more wild areas
of our National Forests protected from industrial use such as commercial
timber harvest and motorized vehicles.
Local Wyoming Citizens Want Roadless Areas Protected
The County Land Management Study, dated October 28, 1998, focused on how
residents of Albany County, Carbon County, Converse County and Platte County
want to see the MBNF managed over the next ten years.
- In all four counties the highest priority in managing the MBNF was to
consider the way the Forest looks when making management decisions. The
second most important consideration in all four counties was to provide
open areas for recreation that are not roaded (motorized) nor designated
as Wilderness. We interpret this to mean that protecting roadless areas
from commercial timber harvest and road construction is important to
residents in Albany, Carbon, Converse and Platte counties. This priority
was ranked second in importance in all four counties and above industrial
interests in all four counties. (See page 25, D. Desired Future Conditions)
Other issues that were ranked third and fourth in terms of importance
were:
- Residents of Albany County wanted plants and animals to be considered
over humans and wanted more land to be set aside as designated Wilderness,
third and forth priorities respectively.
- In the remaining counties, Carbon, Converse and Platte County residents
wanted the MBNF to continue to provide products for their economic benefits
to the community and consider plants and animals over humans when making
decisions, third and fourth priorities respectively.
The second study was the Carbon County Land Use Plan --Draft-- from
October 31, 1997.
- This study found that residents in Carbon County preferred to have an
increase in governmental efforts to conserve timber, wildlife and water
resources on the Medicine Bow National Forest (47.3%) rather than to
harvest more timber on the MBNF to produce more commercial wood products
(42.0%). (See Table 2-8)
- The survey also found citizens were evenly split, just under 45% want
more federal lands available to local timber companies for commercial
harvest of timber, and just over 45% do not support more federal lands
available for timber. These results are consistent with another question
that found almost two-thirds of the citizens polled want more federal land
in Carbon County designated for purposes of conserving fish & wildlife
habitat, as well as surface and groundwater resources. (69.5 % to 22.3%
respectively, Table 2-11). Further, citizens overwhelmingly responded that
more federal land in Carbon County should be designated for public
recreation. See Table 2-11.
- Finally, residents in Carbon County felt that fishing, nature
appreciation, hunting and overnight camping were the most important
recreation opportunities.
|